Legislative Update displays bills pending in the 2015-2016 state legislative sessions. It is updated weekly. To view bills from the 2013-2014 sessions and their results, see Legislative Archive.
Bills are listed by state and subject, with a brief explanation of what's in the bill. Unless indicated otherwise, we believe the listed bills should not pass. Unfortunately, most CAM bills filed in the state legislatures are pro-CAM. Bills added to the list this week, or with updated information, are marked NEW!
To voice your opinion on these bills (and we hope you will) you need to find out where they are in the legislative process and how to contact state legislators in the states where they are pending. See FAQS for more information on how to do this. Each year there are many bills forcing public and private health insurance providers to cover CAM services (especially chiropractic). Because of the sheer volume of these bills we are unable to include them in our legislative updates at this time.
For more information on naturopathy and why naturopaths should not be licensed see the
CALIFORNIA: Assembly Bill 1992. Failed; Legislature adjourned. Would allow chiropractors and naturopaths (as well as nurse practitioners) to perform sports physicals for school athletes.
COLORADO: House Bill 1075. Passed House & Senate; signed by Governor. Committees considering this bill kept adding additional limitations on naturopathic practice as it moved through the House. Colorado passed a naturopathic registration (but not licensing) act for naturopaths in 2013. The bill contained provisions protecting children by placing restrictions on naturopathic treatment of pediatric "clients" including a complete ban on their seeing patients under 2 years of age. (Those who see naturopaths are not referred to as "patients" in the naturopathic registration law, but are called "clients.") They tried to get rid of these restrictions last year, but failed. This year, they are attempting a more modest amendment than in 2014. Instead of completely lifting the pediatric practice restrictions, they are asking the legislature to allow them to see clients younger than 2, but with the same restrictions that apply to clients between 2 and 8: providing the parent with the recommended vaccination schedule, 3 hours of yearly continuing education in pediatrics, informing the parent that the naturopath is not a licensed physician, recommending that the child have a relationship with a licensed health care provider and referring a child to such a provider for a wellness evaluation if the child has no such relationship. Bill amended in committee to add additional hours of training, including recognizing a sick infant and when to refer an infant for more intensive care and, in its latest version, requiring a collaborative agreement with a licensed pediatrician or family practice physician to "ensure safety" of clients under 2. Naturopathic registration law will undergo "sunset review" and could be repealed in its entirety on September 1, 2017. The state must collect data from naturopaths who see clients under 2, including adverse reactions to naturopathic treatments.
COLORADO: House Bill 1352. Passed House & Senate; signed by Governor. Expands scope of naturopathic practice to include broader prescription rights. Bill would allow naturopaths to inject vitamins and non-prescription drugs, and order these from wholesalers and other suppliers.
CONNECTICUT: House Bill 6797. Failed; Legislature adjourned. Last year Connecticut "modernized" the naturopathic scope of practice by substantially expanding it. Naturopaths failed to get prescription privileges but are trying again this year. No bill allowing them to prescribe has been introduced, but this bill directs the Department of Health, in consultation with the state Board of Naturopathic Examiners, to submit a report to the legislature, by February, 2016, on the naturopathic scope of practice, including prescribing privileges.
HAWAII: Senate Bill 1216.Failed deadline for further consideration. This bill allows naturopaths to corner the market in colon hydrotherapy by specifically excluding others, except licensed physicians and nurse practitioners (who wouldn't use it on patients for "detoxification" anyway) from performing it. The rationale is colon hydrotherapy can be dangerous when performed by untrained persons. That is true, but allowing only trained persons to use it doesn't address a more basic issue with colonic hydrotherapy: it is based on the
HAWAII: Senate Bill 2332, House Bill 2256. Failed deadline for further consideration. Would allow naturopaths to prescribe controlled substances other than narcotics. Bill preamble states that naturopaths are "experts in bio-identical hormone replacement therapy" as a rationale for allowing them to prescribe controlled substances like testosterone. Actually, there is no evidence that
IDAHO: House Bill 181. Failed; Legislature adjourned. [see Senate Bill 1177, below.] This bill appears to be a new iteration of naturopathic licensing bills with a new and even broader scope of practice. Gone is the language defining naturopathy in terms of the "body's self-healing ability," i.e., vitalism. Defines "naturopathic medicine" as "a distinct and comprehensive system of primary health care practiced by naturopathic physicians" and "natural health care services" as a "broad domain" including "diagnosis and treatment," but leaves the content of naturopathic practice largely up to a Board of Naturopathic "Physicians" using the vague standard that the practices permitted by the new law must be "consistent with naturopathic education and training." Could perform minor office procedures, prescribe prescription drugs and medical devices as determined by a formulary approved by the Board. The Board can approve "specialties," which are not defined in the bill but which presumably would include such things as "naturopathic oncology" and "naturopathic childbirth attendance." "Gross negligence [but apparently not regular negligence], incompetence or misconduct" is prohibited, but not falling below a standard of care. No malpractice insurance is required. Naturopaths cannot be disciplined solely for using "unconventional" practices unless a patient is actually harmed and the patient has signed a waiver acknowledging the practice is "unconventional." Conviction of a crime is grounds for discipline but naturopath can request an "exemption review" so that his conviction doesn't count against him, if the Board establishes a rule allowing such reviews.
IDAHO: Senate 1177. Passed; signed by Governor. Repeals naturopathic licensing. All current licenses declared null and void.
ILLINOIS: Senate Bill 1601; House Bill 3508. Failed; Legislature adjourned. Like last year's unsuccessful naturopathic licensing bills, these bills would license naturopathic "physicians" but are vague on details. Would be regulated by the state medical licensing board and state medical disciplinary board, each of which would have one naturopath member. No scope of practice defined, but they would be able to perform a number of tasks that medical doctors now perform, such as certify sick leave for certain state employees.
INDIANA: House Resolution 14. No action taken; Legislature adjourned. Urges legislative council to assign a study committee to look into licensure of naturopaths.
IOWA: Senate Study Bill 1067; House Study Bill 51. Bills failed legislative deadline for further consideration. Naturopathic licensing bills. These bills are identical and have the same provisions as study bills that failed to pass last year. In Iowa, study bills are used to determine reception to an issue by the General Assembly and are developed under the auspices of a legislative committee. If a study bill is approved by the committee it can then be considered by the General Assembly. These study bills would give NDs an extremely broad scope of practice comparable to an MD or DO PCP and they could call themselves "physicians." NDs could diagnose and treat any patient with any disease or condition, order lab tests and diagnostic imaging, and prescribe drugs unless the drug is excluded by the naturopathic exclusionary formulary. They could administer drugs by numerous methods, including IV. NDs would be governed by the Medical Board acting on the advice of a naturopathic advisory committee, consisting of 4 NDs, one MD or DO, one pharmacist and one public member, giving the NDs an automatic majority. This advisory committee would recommend which prescription drugs would be excluded from naturopathic practice. In other words, drugs are presumed included unless excluded. No malpractice insurance is required.
MARYLAND: Senate Bill 806. Passed Legislature; became law without Governor's signature. Maryland recently licensed naturopaths, but with a narrower scope of practice than they desired, their ultimate goal being full primary care physician status, including prescription rights. Now they are coming back to the legislature for more. This bill would establish a formulary committee consisting of 2 NDs, 2 MDs, a pharmacist and a consumer. As they did when they drafted the rules regulating naturopaths, they could easily get a sympathetic consumer on the Committee. If listed on the formulary, they could prescribe drugs (but not controlled substances) and medical devices.
MISSISSIPPI: Senate Bill 2290. Died in Committee; Legislature adjourned. Naturopathic licensing bill. Same or similar provisions to House Bill 725, which failed in the last session. See below for bill details.
MISSISSIPPI: House Bill 725. Failed; Legislature adjourned. Naturopathic licensing bill. Would give naturopaths, who would be allowed to call themselves "physicians," a scope of practice almost as broad as an MD or DO primary care physician. They would be regulated by their own board, the Board of Naturopathic Medicine. They could prescribe drugs, if these drugs are on the naturopathic formulary approved by a formulary council consisting of 2 two naturopaths, two pharmacists and one MD or DO. The approved prescription drugs could be by all the usual routes, including IV. Naturopaths could practice "naturopathic childbirth attendance" as well, with some additional training and passing an approved exam. One of these exams is that of the North American Registry of Midwives, an organization of "direct-entry midwives," that is, midwives who have no formal medical training. All the usual naturopathic nostrums would be included in their practice act: dietary supplements, homeopathy, enzymes, vitamins, minerals, colonic hydrotherapy. They would be allowed to use a wide range of diagnostic procedures, including ordering and performing phlebotomy, clinical lab tests, orificial exams, and physiological function tests and ordering diagnostic imagining. These would presumably include such things as PET scans, MRIs, x-rays, spirometry and cardiac function testing.
MONTANA: Senate Bill 133. Failed deadline; Legislature adjourned. Currently, naturopaths have a
NEVADA: Senate Bill 408. Failed; Legislature adjourned. Naturopathic licensing bill. Would give naturopaths scope of practice very close to an MD/DO primary care physician. Allows naturopaths to diagnose and treat any patient with any disease or condition. Can prescribe and dispense drugs, can do injections, can prescribe controlled substances and use IVs with permission of naturopathic board, can perform minor office procedures, use all diagnostic methods, including imagining. Does not define naturopathy as vitalism, but rather just like practice of medicine. No malpractice insurance required.
NEW JERSEY: Failed; died in committee; legislature adjourned. Assembly Bill 814, Senate Bill 1190. Naturopathic licensing bill. Bill defines naturopathic doctors as practitioners of primary health care and gives them the authority to independently diagnose and treat any patient with any condition, injury or disease. Naturopaths could order diagnostic tests, including x-rays; use typical naturopathic remedies such as homeopathy, dietary supplements, colonic irrigation, and "neutraceuticals;" and prescribe durable medical equipment. They would be self-governed by a naturopathic board. Establishes an advisory committee to look into "naturopathic childbirth attendance."
NORTH DAKOTA: Senate Bill 2194. Failed to pass; Legislature adjourned. Expands naturopathic scope of practice to include prescription drugs if on a formulary established by a subcommittee of the Board of Integrative Medicine consisting of an MD or DO, naturopath, pharmacist and APRN. Formulary cannot include Schedule I-IV controlled substances except
OREGON: House Bill 3301. Passed House & Senate; signed by Governor. Would force insurers to allow naturopathic "physicians" to choose whether they want to be credentialed as a primary care provider or specialty care provider. Redefines naturopathy as "primary care" in state law.
PENNSYLVANIA: House Bill 516. Passed House and Senate; signed by Governor. Originally a naturopathic licensing bill; amended in Senate Committee to become a registration bill. No definition of naturopathy or indication of what naturopaths could and could not do; would practice under jurisdiction of medical board. Appears to be a "foot-in-the-door" strategy; naturopaths committed to coming back to legislature until full PCP scope of practice granted. Original bill, which passed in House, granted naturopaths a broad scope of practice, defining naturopathy as "a system of primary health care," allowing them to diagnose and treat any patient with any disease or condition. Could not prescribe drugs but can use homeopathy (defined as substances "given in microdosage in the prevention and treatment of disease"), vitamins, minerals and enzymes, colon hydrotherapy and "electromagnetic energy," and
RHODE ISLAND: Senate Bills 94, 331, House Bills 5501,5380. Failed to pass; Legislature adjourned. These bills are similar to a licensing bill that failed to pass last year. Gives naturopaths a broad scope of practice similar to MD/DO primary care physicians. Could diagnose any patient of any age with any disease or condition using all diagnostic methods "commonly used" by medical PCPs, a term that is undefined. Presumably, this would include the ability to order and interpret the reports of, for example, EKGs, MRIs, CT scans, PET scans, EEGs. Defines naturopathy as the practice of supporting and stimulating the body's self-healing ability, i.e., vitalism. Permits prescription of "natural medicines" and defines "natural" as "present in, produced by, or derived from nature," which could mean practically any substance. Permits use of homeopathy. NDs would be overseen by Department of Health with two naturopaths as its sole advisors.
RHODE ISLAND: Senate Bill 2050. Failed; died in committee; Legislature adjourned. Appears to be the same as bills that failed in previous years (see above), reintroduced with a new number. Gives naturopaths a broad scope of practice similar to MD/DO primary care physicians. Could diagnose any patient of any age with any disease or condition using all diagnostic methods "commonly used" by physicians, but does not otherwise specify these methods. Presumably, this would include the ability to order and interpret the reports of, for example, EKGs, MRIs, CT scans, PET scans, EEGs. Defines naturopathy as the practice of supporting and stimulating the body's self-healing ability, i.e., vitalism. Permits prescription of "natural medicines" and defines "natural" as "present in, produced by, or derived from nature," which could mean practically any substance. Permits use of homeopathy. NDs would be overseen by Department of Health with two naturopaths as its sole advisors.
VERMONT: House Bill 791. Died in committee; Legislature adjourned. Currently, naturopaths are under the regulatory jurisdiction of the Director of the Office of Professional Regulation, which is advised by two appointed naturopaths. Bill would allow naturopaths to self-regulate under Board of Naturopathic Physicians.
WASHINGTON: Failed; Legislature adjourned. House Bill 2304, Senate Bill 5815. Would substantially expand naturopathic prescribing privileges. Authorizes a naturopath to prescribe and administer legend drugs; hydrocodone products contained in Schedule II of the uniform controlled substances act; and controlled substances contained in Schedules III through V of the uniform controlled substances act.including right to prescribe all legend drugs and many controlled substances, among them hydrocodone. Naturopathy board is not required to establish additional education and training requirements for these privileges. As has been extensively documented, naturopathic education in pharmacology is woefully inadequate clinical education virtually non-existent. (See this SFSBM post for further information.)
ARIZONA: House Bill 2215. Failed; Legislature adjourned. Establishes certification for chiropractors to practice "animal chiropractic." For veterinarians, establishes a "specialist certification" in animal chirorpactic. Applicants must complete a "postgraduate course" in animal chiropractic and pass an exam. These "postgraduate courses" are weekend programs at small animal chiropractic trade-type schools not affiliated with any accredited institution of higher education except one at Parker University, a straight chiropractic college.
ARIZONA: Senate Bill 1040. Failed; Legislature adjourned. Permits chiropractors "certified in pharmacology" to prescribe prescription-strength doses of ibuprofen, naproxen,
CALIFORNIA: Failed to pass out of committee. Assembly Bill 1992. Would allow chiropractors and naturopaths (as well as nurse practitioners) to perform sports physicals for school athletes.
HAWAII: House Bill 997. Failed deadline for further consideration. Expands chiropractic scope of practice and allows chiropractors to call themselves "physicians." Currently, chiropractors are limited to "adjustments" of the spine with limited permission to treat certain extra-spinal neuromusculoskeletal conditions. This bill would eliminate those restrictions and allow chiropractors to diagnose and treat any disease or abnormality (except for use of legend drugs and surgery), the only limitation being that diagnostic methods and treatments be taught by an accredited chiropractic college. They could also employ "clinical nutritional methods," which would give them the authority to perform bogus "nutritional" testing and sell dietary supplements to patients. They could use or order diagnostic and laboratory testing as well as any other method of diagnostic examination as long as the latter are taught by chiropractic colleges and approved by the state chiropractic board. This is another of several recent attempts in the state legislatures to default to the chiropractic colleges to determine a chiropractor's scope of practice.
IDAHO: House Bill 593. Failed; Legislature adjourned. Would permit chiropractors to prescribe and sell to patients vitamins, minterals, botanicals, herbs, homeopathic remedies, enzymes and glandulars (dessicated animal organs), among other items, a terrible conflict of interest. They could administer these substances enterally and transdermally, among other methods. A chiropractor with a "certificate in clinical nutrition" could also adminsiter these substances via IV, IM, intra-articular, subcutaneous and subdermal routes. The certificate could be obtained after a mere 120 hours of classroom and clinical instruction. Chiropractic formulary committee, consisting of 2 chiropractors, 1 pharmacist, 1 MD, and a public member would create formulary of approved substances.
LOUISIANA: Senate Bill 208. Failed; died in committee. Similar to bill introduced last year (see below). Current law is based on the traditional chiropractic concept that "interference" in normal "nerve flow" can be corrected to the benefit of the patient's health, a view of anatomy long rejected by medical science. This bill retains that feature, but seems to limit the purpose of chiropractic treatment to neuromusculoskeletal conditions of the spine and extremeties to correct functional conditions, pain and disability. Adds that chiropractors can advise on "health and wellness" and use diagnostic tests relevant to "the patient's condition." This could leave the door open to quack tests to determine bogus vitamin "deficiencies" and the like.
LOUISIANA: House Bill 552, Senate Bill 56. Failed; Legislature adjourned. Expands scope of practice by removing restrictions on performing and ordering diagnostic imaging and changing definition of chiropractic practice from diagnosing and treating conditions "associated with the functional integrity of the spine" to diagnosing patients to determine "conditions related to the function of the neuromuscular or musculoskeletal system." The bill was amended several times to reduce the scope of practice, although all definitions have been so broad and vague as to leave plenty of room for creative maneuvering. Adds that chiropractors can counsel patients regarding "health, wellness, diet and nutrition." Unfortunately, this can lead the way to chiropractors using bogus diagnostic tests to sell dietary supplements.
MISSISSIPPI: House Bill 729. Failed; Died in committee; Legislature adjourned. Chiropractic is defined under current law as the analysis of "nerve interferences" and manipulation/adjustment to "restore and maintain health." This is straight "subluxation" based chiropractic. Chiropractors are permitted to use x-rays in their practices. This bill would allow them to use any "radiologic technologies" necessary for their services. Thus, the bill would allow the use of PET scans, CT scans, MRIs and other forms of radiation-emitting technologies to detect the non-existent chiropractic "subluxation," thereby exposing patients to radiation for no good reason.
MICHIGAN: House Bill 4712. Failed; Legislature adjourned. Chiropractors are pushing for the right to prescribe physical therapy, not via expansion of their practice act to add prescription privileges, which they currently do not enjoy, but by simply adding themselves to the list of practitioners who can prescribe. Physical therapists, as well as MDs and insurance and business interests, oppose the bill. PTs say chiropractors can already refer patients to them and that, if an actual prescription is needed, the patient needs to see an MD, DO, DPM or DDS/DMD. Only these professionals are properly educated and trained to fully assess the patient's bio-medical issues and determine whether physical therapy, drugs, surgery or some other treatment is appropriate. Chiropractors have neither the scope of practice nor the ability to do this.
NEBRASKA: Legislative Bill 211. Failed; Legislature adjourned. Under current law, school children must have a physical exam and eye exam at certain ages performed by a physician, physician's assistant or APRN. An optometrist can also perform the the exam. This bill would also allow chiropractors to perform physical and eye exams.
NEW MEXICO: Senate Bill 376. Failed; Legislature adjourned. This is another effort in a continuing attempt to
TEXAS: House Bill 3925. Failed; Legislature adjourned. Expands chiropractic scope of practice in a way that may not be obvious to those unfamiliar with chiropractic code words. Under current law, chiropractors can analyze and treat a "biomechanical condition of the spine and musculoskeletal system." Treatments include "adjustments" and other nonsurgical procedures "to improve the
VIRGINIA: House Bill 1098. Continued to 2017 in Health, Welfare & Institutions Comm. Expands chiropractic scope of practice to include physical exams for commercial driver's licenses or commercial learner's permit. Similar to a bill that failed last year. (See next entry.)
VIRGINIA: Senate Bill 1244. Failed; Legislature adjourned. Expands chiropractic scope of practice to include
WYOMING: Senate Bills 61 and 79. SB 61 withdrawn; SB 79 Failed legislative deadline; Legislature adjourned. Permits chiropractors to use the term "chiropractic physician."
Acupuncture, Traditional Chinese Medicine and Oriental Medicine
COLORADO: House Bill 1360. Passed House & Senate; signed by Governor. Expands acupuncture scope of practice to include injection therapy: the injections of sterile herbs, vitamins, minerals, homeopathic substances, sarapin, saline, glucose, procaine and lidocaine into acupuncture points.
IOWA: House Study Bill 101. Failed legislative deadline for further consideration. Substantially expands acupuncturist's scope of practice to include "oriental medicine," which includes moxibustion, cupping, reflexology, magnets, herbal medicine, dietary supplements, mind-body techniques and stimulation by a device that doesn't pierce the skin. Defaults to the acupuncture accrediting organizations to determine what other clinical practices can be added. In addition, acupuncturists would be allowed to "promote, maintain, and restore health, improve bodily function and prevent disease." Existing requirement that patients be notified that the acupuncturist's services must not be regarded as diagnosis, treatment, opinion or advice from a physician is eliminated.
KANSAS: Senate Bill 363; House Bill 2615.
LOUISIANA: House Bill 557. Signed into law by Governor. Provides for licensing of acupuncturists who have met certain education requirements. Eliminated requirement that acupuncturists work under direct supervision of physician, but must maintain relationship with physician under rules to be established by State Board of Medical Examiners. Acupuncture "detoxification" specialists may practice under supervision of physician or licensed acupuncturist. Physicians may practice as "physicians acupuncturists" with additional training.
MASSACHUSETTS: Failed; still in Committee on adjournment of formal legislative session. Senate Bill 2352 (Substitute for House Bill 930 & Senate Bill 1231). In addition to expanding health insurance coverage for acupuncture, would establish a commission to investigate "better integrated use of acupuncture services."
MAINE: House Bill 751. Vetoed by Governor; House failed to override veto. Establishes a pilot project for treatment of substance abuse disorders with
MISSISSIPPI: House Bills 82 & 83, Senate Bill 2022. Failed; Legislature adjourned. Further attempts, after failure in previous years (see below), to remove some physician oversight from acupuncture practice. HB 82 deletes referral requirement if patient has a previous evaluation by physician or dentist. If patient being treated for chronic pain, alcoholism or substance abuse, must be referred to physician or dentist if no substantial improvement after 20 treatments. Oddly, patients being treated by a chiropractor must still get referral, but acupuncturist must refer to physician or dentist if no substantial improvement. HB 83 removes referral requirement if only patient being treated for pain and only if patient has a current prescription for an analgesic drug. SB 2022 simply removes the referral requirement altogether.
MISSISSIPPI: Senate Bill 2319; House Bill 898. Failed; Died in committee; Legislature adjourned. Acupuncturists are again trying to repeal a requirement that a physician examine a patient and give the patient a referral to an acupuncturist before the acupuncturist can treat the patient. Similar bills were defeated last year.
NEBRASKA: Failed; Legislature adjourned. Legislative Bill 962. Current law requires a referral from a physician for an acupuncturist to treat a patient. Bill would remove that requirement, adding that the acupuncturist must refer patient to appropriate practitioner when problem is beyond his training or competence.
NEW YORK: Assembly Bill 2558, Senate Bill 3911. AB 2558 passed Assembly; substituted for SB 3911; passed Senate; signed by Governor. Expands acupuncture scope of practice to include recommendation of diet, herbs and "natural products." These include custom-made remedies and herbal products, but only with passage of "herbal competency exam." Adds continuing education requirements for acupuncturists and makes changes to their regulatory board, one of which is to include 3 physicians who practice acupuncture.
NEW YORK: Assembly Bill 2462. Passed Assembly and Senate; vetoed by Governor. Adds acupuncture services to workers compensation coverage. SfSBM does not normally follow attempts by CAM practitioners to force coverage of their services by public and private insurance via legislative mandates. However, we applaud Gov. Cuomo for vetoing the latest attempt by NY acupuncturists to mandate coverage of acupuncture by workers compensation.
NORTH DAKOTA: Senate Bill 2191. Signed into law by Governor. Acupuncture licensing act. Defines scope of practice fairly narrowly as including botanical medicine and needle acupuncture, but without "electronic stimulation." Provides that hospitals may employ acupuncturists. Would be regulated by State Board of Integrative Health Care.
OKLAHOMA: Senate Bill 489. Failed legislative deadline for further consideration. Acupuncture licensing act giving acupuncturists an extremely broad scope of practice. Acupuncture is defined as a form of "primary health care" that "employs acupuncture diagnosis and treatment" and "adjunctive therapies and diagnostic techniques" for "promotion, maintenance and restoration of health and the prevention of disease." There is absolutely no evidence that acupuncture does any of these things. They may, among other methods, employ needle acupuncture and moxibustion, prescribe herbs, and give dietary advice. Puts acupuncturists under the jurisdiction of the State Board of Medical Licensure and Supervision, but the Board's authority to enact regulations is limited to subjects like continuing education and certain other matters regarding licensing. Advisory Committee consisting of acupuncturists and public members advises Board. No malpractice insurance required.
RHODE ISLAND: House Bill 5381; Senate Bill 234. HB 5381 signed into law by Governor. Adds the practice of "Oriental medicine" to acupuncture practice act. Defined very broadly as a form of "primary health care" using Chinese medical and acupuncture diagnostics, including those based on "newer scientific models" for "assessment, treatment, prevention and cure of any disease." May use acupuncture, moxibustion, gwa/sha, thermography, herbs, homeopathy and "supplement therapy."
RHODE ISLAND: House Bill 7897, Senate Bill 2508. HB 7897 & SB 2508 passed in House & Senate; signed into law by Governor. Currently acupuncturists and Oriental medicine practitioners are regulated by the State Department of Health. This bill creates Board of Acupuncture and Oriental Medicine.
RHODE ISLAND: House Bill 7130, Senate Bill 2948. HB 7130 & SB 2948 passed in House & Senate; signed into law by Governor. Would allow chemical dependency professionals to use "
VERMONT: Died in committee; Legislature adjourned. House Bill 520. Would allow physicians to treat patients with acupuncture under rules established by the medical board.
WYOMING: House Bill 246. Failed; died in committee. Acupuncture and oriental medicine licensing bill. Defines acupuncture and oriental medicine broadly as a "form of primary health care" based on oriental medicine concepts for diagnosis and treatment of disease and health promotion. Could "stimulate points on the body" with lancets, needles, magnets, electricity and suction, among other methods. Could prescribe and sell, among others, herbal remedies to patients, as well as homeopathic treatments, glandulars and dietary supplements. Would be regulated by a board consisting of 4 acupuncturists and one public member.
Other CAM Practitioners
NEVADA: Assembly Bill 295. Passed in Assembly & Senate; signed by Governor. This is a form of "health freedom" bill that gives a safe harbor to people who don't have a health care practitioner license, such as a license to practice chiropractic or massage. Under state law, such people are subject to allegations of practicing without the appropriate license. The bill permits "CAM" providers who do not have health care practitioner licenses to offer specified services, such as nondiagnostic iridology" reflexology, and holistic kinesiology. Unfortunately, it also includes treatments that can be dangerous, such as Gerson therapy, detoxification practices, herbalism, and use of dietary supplements and "nutrients." No education or training is needed to perform any of these practices.
Other Bills of Interest
WASHINGTON: House Bill 1476, Senate Bill 5408. Failed legislative deadline for further consideration. Under current law, failure to provide medical care to a child or dependent person can constitute criminal mistreatment and can be punished as a misdemeanor or felony. However, the statute provides an exemption: Christian Science treatment by a Christian Science practitioner in lieu of medical care is not considered deprivation of medically necessary health care. A civil statute governing protection of children from abuse and neglect states that Christian Science treatment in lieu of medical care is not by itself neglect. The bills would repeal both the criminal and civil provisions.